Backing the royal commission: why accountability will restore public trust

Published July 28, 2026 at 9:02 PM UTC

Authored by

Key Points

Royal commission seen as vital to combat corruption and restore public confidence in infrastructure spending.
Supports argue it will improve accountability and potentially recover wasted taxpayer funds.
Political benefit for Labor: demonstrates commitment to good governance ahead of election.
Long-term reforms could lead to more efficient project delivery and better value for money.

Background History

Victoria's Big Build has faced repeated criticism over cost overruns, with the West Gate Tunnel's budget rising from $5.5 billion to over $10 billion. Corruption allegations involving union and company officials have also surfaced, prompting earlier parliamentary inquiries. The royal commission is the most powerful investigative tool available to address these systemic issues.

Supporters of the royal commission argue that a thorough investigation is essential to clean up Victoria's construction sector and restore taxpayer confidence. The Big Build has been plagued by cost blowouts and corruption allegations, with projects like the West Gate Tunnel exceeding budgets by billions. A royal commission has the power to compel evidence and recommend criminal charges, which could deter future misconduct. For the Labor government, the inquiry is a politically astute move that addresses voter concerns about waste and mismanagement. By showing a commitment to transparency, Labor can defuse opposition attacks and strengthen its standing ahead of the state election. Construction industry insiders say reform is overdue, as the current system allows for inflated contracts and opaque dealings. The commission could also lead to better value for money, with savings potentially redirected to other public services. Ultimately, backers see the inquiry as a necessary step to ensure that Victoria's infrastructure boom benefits communities, not just contractors.