Proponents of the Amnesty Law maintain that it is a vital instrument for resolving a long-standing political conflict that has deeply divided Spanish society. By choosing to move past the judicial consequences of the 2017 events, the government is prioritizing dialogue and social cohesion over continued litigation. Supporters argue that this approach is a legitimate exercise of parliamentary sovereignty, designed to foster a more inclusive political environment in Catalonia.
From this perspective, the law is not an attack on the judiciary but a pragmatic political solution to a political problem. Advocates emphasize that democratic systems must have the flexibility to address historical grievances through legislative action. They contend that the European legal framework should respect the autonomy of member states to manage their internal political affairs, provided that fundamental rights are not compromised.
Furthermore, supporters point out that the law has already facilitated a return to normal institutional relations between the central government and regional authorities. They argue that the stability of the current government is a reflection of a broader public desire to move beyond the polarization of the past. For these stakeholders, the CJEU review is an opportunity to confirm that national reconciliation efforts are compatible with European values when they are aimed at strengthening democratic participation.
Ultimately, those backing the law believe that the path forward requires bold political decisions. They argue that the benefits of ending the judicialization of the Catalan conflict far outweigh the procedural concerns raised by the opposition. By integrating separatist voices back into the mainstream political process, the government aims to ensure long-term peace and cooperation within the Spanish state.