Supporters of the Victorian government’s approach to the Big Build argue that the administration has taken decisive, practical steps to address industrial misconduct without the need for a costly and time-consuming Royal Commission. By implementing a new administrative framework and working closely with law enforcement, the government has sought to dismantle the influence of corrupt elements within the construction sector. Proponents emphasize that the focus has been on structural reform, such as the appointment of an administrator to oversee the CFMEU, which has already led to a more cooperative relationship with Victoria Police and the Australian Federal Police.
From this perspective, the government’s response has been both measured and effective. Supporters point out that the construction industry is inherently complex and that the government has had to balance the need for rapid infrastructure delivery with the challenge of managing powerful industrial stakeholders. They argue that the Premier’s admission of past issues demonstrates a willingness to confront difficult truths, while the ongoing police investigations prove that the government is not shielding anyone from the consequences of illegal activity. By prioritizing these targeted interventions, the government aims to ensure that the Big Build continues to deliver essential services to the public.
Furthermore, advocates for the current strategy suggest that the political attacks from the opposition are aimed more at undermining the government’s reputation than at achieving genuine reform. They argue that the government has consistently referred allegations of criminality to the appropriate authorities, fulfilling its duty to uphold the law. For those backing the government, the priority is to maintain the momentum of the infrastructure program, which is vital for the state’s economic growth and long-term connectivity, rather than getting bogged down in political theatre that could delay critical projects.